A Comparison of Quality and Business Excellence Programs in the World Assignment

A Comparison of Quality and Business Excellence Programs in the World - Assignment Example ms are organized for specific missions such as best practice sharing, continuous management and quality initiatives, promotion, recognition of top performers, understanding performance excellence requirements, etc. Core values and concepts related to awards keeps on changing with companies. There are certain common core values like social responsibility, leadership, customer, people, management, learning, innovation, etc (Miguel, 2005). Awards have specific categories for individuals and this helps them to remain competitive in long run. In sessions there has been discussion on quality management and its significant benefits. Quality management is not only related to enhanced machinery productivity but is also closely knitted with overall organizational productivity. Team members are motivated through award programs and this even helps to upgrade corporate image. The criteria categories indicate dimensions of award programs like customer, information and data, performance and measurement, people, resources, processes, society, results and strategies. Award level is distinct in different geographical regions. European award level has categories such as award winner, finalist, prize winner, etc. On the other hand, Wales’s quality award has levels like gold, platinum, bronze and silver. The article analyzed the different criteria’s for awards across the globe. Process improvement, benchmark and performance excellence are key objectives of award programs. This statement has been well supported by varying criteria’s across award programs. Figure 3 clearly indicates that communication and best practice sharing are common objectives or award mission. This proves that there is a common ground for designing award programs. These criteria’s are aligned with Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Business excellence depends on certain quality dimensions as described in figure 6. These dimensions are customer, people, leadership, strategies, results and